Of course, the merchandise is sold at MSRP, but if you lose big, you can salve your wounds a bit by buying the item for a not-terrible price. Say you blow 100 bids in a failed attempt to get that flatscreen TV -- Swoopo will give you $60 (100 bids at 60¢ each) off list if you buy it outright (and spot-checking a few items against Amazon suggests that Swoopo "list" is a pretty reasonable price).
Several issues:
- There's a tight time-limit: you only have an hour to redeem the bids
- You can do it while the auction is running -- but then you automatically lose.
- Free bids are excluded, of course.
- It isn't clear from the terms whether bids you buy at auction are valid: "vouchers" are excluded and auctioned bid packs are sometimes, but not always, referred to as "vouchers" on the site.
Of course, that assumes that there are a lot of bidders out there who think like I do. We'll see.
I like your last point. It seems to me that to keep bidders from excessively bidding because their sunk cost is no longer sunk they should only get a percentage of the cost of the bid back to use toward the SIN. If they got 40 cents for each bid (which costs 60 cents) then they would have an incentive to restrict their bids. If, like you point out, users have bid enough times so that MSRP - bids placed < Amazon price than users have no incentive to stop bidding. This means auctions will be harder to win and also that Swoopo makes more money.
ReplyDelete"This means auctions will be harder to win and also that Swoopo makes more money."
ReplyDeleteWell, Swoopo only makes money because they are perceived as a low-cost option. When that is no longer true, why would people go to Swoopo instead of Amazon?